How Effective are the Legal Reforms in the Management of Witness Evidence for Business and Property Courts of England and Wales?

Hasan Alqaisi

doi:10.59973/emjsr.189

Authors

Hasan Alqaisi City University London, Department of Law, London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59973/emjsr.189

Keywords:

Witness; , Evidence; , Witness Statements; , Legal Reforms; , Business and Property Courts.

Abstract

This study focuses on a critical examination into the extent in which the new PD57AC has been effective in the management of the witness evidence in the Business and Property Court of England and Wales. In particular, the study has determined that the new Practice Direction has somewhat performed in the regulation of the wording of the witness statements, references to witness statements in preparation, applications for objections to the witness statements, and the option of the court where drafters of the witness statements are non-compliant. Yet the thesis has also found out that despite the far-reaching reforms on the management of witness evidence under this Practice Direction, there are more areas that need improvement. This includes addressing inconsistencies in the conditions under which a witness statement could be struck out in the cross-examinations and trials at the BPCs.

References

Vorrasi, Kenneth M. ”England’s reform to alleviate the problems of civil process: a comparison of judicial case management in England and the United States.” J. Legis. 30 (2003): 361.

Turnbull, Robert D., and Doug Jones AO. ”Memorials and Witness Statements: The Need for Reform.” Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management 88, no. 3 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/AMDM2022024

Steele, Mark J. ”Report of the witness evidence working group in the UK.” Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association

Winter2020 (2020): 16–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-3-437-23441-5.00005-4

Macgregor, Lucilla, Charlotte Peacey, and Georgina Ridsdale. Civil Litigation. Oxford University Press, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192844293.001.0001

Stowe, Hugh. ”The uncertain ethical frontiers of expert witness preparation.” Precedent (Sydney, NSW) 172 (2022): 16–23.

Durney, Peter M., and Julianne C. Fitzpatrick. ”Retaining and disclosing expert witnesses: a global perspective.” Def. Counsel J. 83 (2016): 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12690/IADC-16-0003

Justice. PRACTICE DIRECTION 57AC – TRIAL WITNESS STATEMENTS IN THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part-57a-business-and-property-courts/

practice-direction-57ac-trial-witness-statements-in-the-business-and-property-courts

Haughney, Georgia. ”Witness statement rules.” Solic. J. 164 (2021): 56.

Lampert, Michael A. ”Is It Time to Modernize Witness Statements in Arbitration?” Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 39, no. 7 (2021): 109–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.21904

Mattison, Michelle, and Penny Cooper. ”Witness statements for employment tribunals in England and Wales: what are the ‘Issues’?.” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 25, no. 4 (2021): 286–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127211046397

Leitch, A. Practice Direction 57AC: Combatting ‘Over-Lawyered’ Witness Statements (2022).

Frenkel v Lyampert & Ors — [2017] EWHC 2223 (Ch).

Justice. PRACTICE DIRECTION 18 – FURTHER INFORMATION. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/

civil/rules/part18/pd_part18

Giret, J. Truth Matters – Enhanced Measures for the Taking and making of Witness Statements for use at Trial.

Heley, Susanna. ”A Heavier Burden: Certificates of Compliance.” Solic. J. 164 (2021): 62.

Alex Lawrie Factors Ltd v Morgan [2001] C.P. Rep. 2, CA.

Tapper, Colin. Cross & Tapper on evidence. Oxford University Press, USA, 2010.

Rock Ltd v RCO (Holdings) Ltd [2004] 1 BCLC 439 CA.

New Media Distribution Co SEZC Ltd v Kagalovsky [2018] EWHC 2742 (Ch).

Browne, Kevin. Civil Litigation 2021/2022. College of Law Publishing, 2021.

PRACTICE DIRECTION 32. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32