The Multi-User Distance Paradox in a Decentralized Cosmic Rendering Engine

Authors

  • Renato Babac Independent Researcher, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.417

Keywords:

Digital Physics, Multi-User Distance Paradox, Client-Side Rendering, Taylor Series Expansion, One-Electron Universe, Planck Limit, Energy-Mass-Frequency Equivalence.

Abstract

Modern digital physics increasingly conceptualizes the universe as an information-processing system. However, at the interface between centralized data storage and decentralized network distribution, this perspective encounters the hitherto unresolved multi-user distance paradox: the simultaneous presence of multiple clients leads to an uncontrolled load explosion and the collapse of the global system budget when conflicting resolution requirements are accumulated purely on the system side. This paper resolves this fundamental paradox by designing a decentralized cosmic rendering engine protected against collapse. It is mathematically proven that a stable cosmos requires a functional partitioning between a centralized information substrate – which manages the persistent existential load of complex matter as a compound object exactly once – and decentralized, client-side runtime streams. A strict informational separation between static object data and kinetic motion overhead is derived via a Taylor series expansion of relativistic mass. By introducing spatial network throttling across the fourth power of distance, the required data rates plummet rapidly in macroscopic space. A final mathematical stress test based on John Wheeler’s hypothetical "one-electron universe" demonstrates the ultimate scalability of the architecture: even with infinitely many parallel streams, the accumulated network load of the overall system does not diverge, but remains mathematically strictly capped by the fundamental Planck limit. Thus, this network architecture paves the way for a completely new, information-theoretic approach to describing fundamental interactions and forces in the cosmos.

References

[1] Wheeler, J. A. (1989). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology (pp. 354–368). Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo.

[2] Lloyd, S. (2002). Computational capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters, 88(23), 237901. https://doi.org/10.1103/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237901

PhysRevLett.88.237901

[3] Vopson, M. M. (2019). The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances, 9(9), 095206. https://doi.org/10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

1063/1.5123794

[4] Babac, R. (2026). Information-Processing Invariance. IPI Letters, 4(1), O1–O5. https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.319

[5] Einstein, A. (1905). ¨Uber einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik, 322(6), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220607

[6] Einstein, A. (1905). Ist die Tr¨agheit eines K ¨orpers von seinem Energieinhalt abh¨angig? Annalen der Physik, 323(13), 639–641.

https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053231314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053231314

[7] Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K ¨orper. Annalen der Physik, 322(10), 891–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004

[8] Vopson, M. M. (2022). Experimental protocol for testing the mass–energy–information equivalence principle. AIP Advances, 12(3), 035311. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087175

[9] Wheeler, J. A., & Ford, K. W. (1998). Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics. W. W. Norton & Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882666

[10] Feynman, R. P. (1965). The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics. Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1965. Nobel Foundation.

[11] Sandifer, C. E. (2007). How Euler Did It. Mathematical Association of America. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9781614445050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/spec/052

[12] Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Babac, R. (2026). The Multi-User Distance Paradox in a Decentralized Cosmic Rendering Engine. IPI Letters, 4(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.417

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)